Not that the regressive forces went quietly:
Opponents of lifting the ban said the change could harm the unit cohesion that is essential to effective military operations, particularly in combat, and deter some Americans from enlisting or pursuing a career in the military. They noted that despite support for repealing the ban from Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, other military commanders have warned that changing the practice would prove disruptive.I wasn't around for it, but I would bet real money that these same arguments were advanced (if you can use that term) when the military ended segregation of African-Americans, too.
I already noted that actual research by the Rand Corporation in 1993 showed little risk to unit cohesion from lifting the ban. It's probably too much to expect some Republican members of the Senate to pay attention to facts, but the rest of us ought to be aware of them.
If "some Americans" avoid the military because they can't stomach the idea of serving with openly gay people, I say the military is better off. We don't need to cater to bigots.
“This isn’t broke,” Senator James M. Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma, said of about the policy. “It is working very well.”It's working well only for less-evolved life forms like yourself, Senator Inhofe.
“In the middle of a military conflict, is not the time to do it,” said Senator Saxby Chambliss, Republican of Georgia.If we waited for peace, the ban would never be repealed. I'm sure Senator Chambliss knows that, too.
The AP quotes Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, boiling down the issue to its starkest, most basic terms:
"No matter how I look at the issue," Mullen said, "I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens."That terrible truth didn't bother Senator John McCain, who "led the opposition" according to the AP.
He blamed elite liberals with no military experience for pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime.Senator McCain, I'm tired of you. It wouldn't have been so bad if you had just stated, right from the start, that you would never support openly declared gays serving in the military. But you weren't that honest: you said you'd defer to the generals and admirals, that you'd let them decide when the ban should go. You thought you could hide behind the military brass forever, that they would never push for repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" in your lifetime.
"They will do what is asked of them," McCain said of service members. "But don't think there won't be a great cost."
I wish I could have seen your face when Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mullen declared their support for repeal a year ago. I'll bet you were flummoxed. How the hell would you justify your prejudice now?
You bought yourself a year by demanding a study, even in the face of the Rand Corporation report more than fifteen years prior. A year passed, the report on the latest study arrived, and you got desperate, because it reached the same conclusion the earlier Rand study did. What to do, what to do?
Oh, right: assume nobody will read it, and hide behind an argument that the report discredits: the old standby, vague concern over "unit cohesion."
I laughed when The Daily Show expertly served you up as a hypocrite, but your biind, unreasoning prejudice is no longer funny. Even worse, you tried to hide your prejudice. The rest of your no-voting cabal, like Senator Inhofe, had the courtesy not to pretend their minds could ever be changed by evidence. You tried to play the middle and hoped you would never be called on it. Well, you were, and you finally had to show your true colors.
You're contemptible, Senator McCain.
At least a majority of your colleagues stood for honor over bigotry today.
I'm really glad to see this happen, but of course I have a few cynical thoughts:
ReplyDelete- The whole "maverick" thing is gone for McCain. He's always been an asshole, but now the press corps are finally catching on.
- Now gays and lesbians have the same right to go die in Middle Eastern deserts in the name of Empire as straight folks. Progress of a sort.
- I suspect that there was some furious horse trading going on with DADT, the Dream act, and the START treaty. The Republicans made the calculation that supporting gay rights was less damaging than supporting immigrant rights. Reducing the number of nuclear weapons from completely insane to almost completely insane remains to be seen.
Speaking of his canonization as an asshole, I notice McCain has not appeared on the Daily Show in a while. I wonder if that's his choice, or Jon's?
ReplyDeleteGays have always had the right to die for Empire. It's just that now, they can tell their comrades, if they wish, to send condolences to "Steve" rather than to "Eve" if they're killed. (Boy, that was quite bitter even for me. You do not bring out my sunny side, Mr. B!)
If horse-trading happened on all those matters, then at least Obama and Senate Dems got something concrete for their troubles. The last time they tried wheeling and dealing on a big scale, they crippled health-care reform in return for ... Senate inaction on climate change. Chalk that one up in the "Pyrrhic victory" column.